2025 June 17
Evolving the preprint evaluation world with Sciety
This post is based on an interview with Sciety team at eLife.
1 September 2022 These 2017 guidelines are not changing but we’ve added a recommendation to improve accessibility for Crossref links on landing pages. Please see our recent call for comments for more information. This page will be updated when the recommendation has been finalized.
“Crossref Display Guidelines (March 2017)", retrieved [date], https://doi-org.ezproxy.csu.edu.au/10.13003/5jchdy
It’s really important for consistency and usability that all members follow these guidelines. We rarely have to change them and usually only do so for very good reasons. Please note that this is for display of Crossref DOIs, not anyone else’s persistent links, as, for example, not all DOIs are made equal.
The goals of the guidelines are to:
When linking to a research work, use its Crossref DOI link rather than its URL. If the URL changes, the publisher will update the metadata in Crossref with the new URL, so that the link will always take you to the correct location of the work.
When displaying DOIs, it’s important to follow these display guidelines. Crossref DOIs should:
Here is an example of canonical DOI display:
These guidelines introduce two important changes that differ from the previous guidelines:
dx
from the domain name portion of Crossref linksNote this change is backwards compatible, so DOIs such as http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.csu.edu.au/ and http://doi.org.ezproxy.csu.edu.au/ which conform to older guidelines will continue to work indefinitely.
Crossref links should be displayed as the full URL link wherever the bibliographic information about the content is displayed.
An obligation of membership is that Crossref persistent links must be displayed on members’ landing pages. We recommend that Crossref links also be displayed or distributed in the following contexts:
Crossref members should not use proprietary, internal, or other non-Crossref links in citation downloads, metadata feeds to third parties, nor in instructions to researchers on how to cite a document. The membership terms stipulate that Crossref persistent identifier links must be the default.
Linking references in journal articles using Crossref DOIs is a condition of membership. This means including the link for each item in your reference list. We strongly encourage members to link references for other record types too. Because there are space constraints even in online references lists, Crossref DOIs can be displayed in several ways, depending on the publisher’s preference and publication style. We recommend the following options:
Learn more about how to link your references.
The DOI Foundation created the ShortDOI service as an open system that creates shortcuts to DOIs. DOIs can be long, so this service aimed to to the same thing as URL shortening services. ShortDOIs are not widely used and are not really actual DOIs themselves, which is confusing. We recommend simply creating shorter DOIs in the first place. Learn more about constructing your DOIs.
These guidelines are now in effect. We set the date as March 2017, after giving our members six months’ notice to make the changes.
Some members have reported resistance from colleagues to displaying the Crossref DOI on the landing page as a link (they say the link in that location appears superfluous as it appears to link to itself). However, the Crossref DOI must be displayed as a link, because it is both an identifier and a persistent link. It is also part of the membership terms agreed to when members join Crossref. It is easier for users when members display the DOI as a full link as they can copy it easily. Also, many users don’t know what a DOI is, but they know what a link is. We want to encourage the DOI to be used as a persistent link, and to be shared and used in other applications (such as reference management tools). A fully linked DOI enables this, wherever it appears.
No - there is no need to redeposit metadata. These guidelines cover how you display DOIs on your website, not how to register them with us.
When Crossref was founded in 2000, we recommended that DOIs be displayed in the format doi:10.NNNN/doisuffix
and many members still use doi:[space][doinumber]
, DOI: [space][doinumber]
, or DOI[space][doinumber]
. At the time that the DOI system was launched in the late 1990s it was thought that doi:
would become native to browsers and automatically resolve DOIs, like http:
. This did not happen, and so doc:
/DOI:
is not a valid way of displaying or linking Crossref DOIs.
Advantages to changing the display to a resolvable URL (even on the page the DOI itself resolves to) include:
dx
as in http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.csu.edu.au/
? Originally the dx
separated the DOI resolver from the International DOI Foundation (IDF) website but this changed a few years ago and the IDF recommends http://doi.org.ezproxy.csu.edu.au
as the preferred form for the domain name in DOI URLs.
Providing the central linking infrastructure for scholarly publishing is something we take seriously. Because we form the connections between publisher content all over the web, it’s important that we do our bit to enable secure browsing from start to finish. In addition, HTTPS is now a ranking signal for Google, which gives sites using HTTPS a small ranking boost.
The process of enabling HTTPS on publisher sites will be a long one, and given the number of members we have, it may take a while before everyone’s made the transition. But by using HTTPS we are future-proofing scholarly linking on the web.
Some years ago we started the process of making our new services available exclusively over HTTPS. The Crossref API is HTTPS enabled, and Crossmark and our Assets CDN use HTTPS exclusively. In 2015 we collaborated with Wikipedia to make all of their DOI links HTTPS. We hope that we’ll start to see more of the scholarly publishing industry doing the same.